|North America -|
|North American Numbering Plan|
|NANPA" redirects here. For other uses, see Nanpa.|
|This article is about the numbering plan. For a list of area codes under the plan, see List of North American Numbering Plan area codes.|
|This article - needs additional citations for verification. - |
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2009). - The - North American Numbering Plan - ( - NANP - ) is an integrated telephone numbering plan of 24 countries and territories: the United States and its territories, Canada, Bermuda, and 16 of the Caribbean countries. The term is also used, by metonymy, to refer to the geographic area in which that plan has been implemented.
|The NANP is a standardized system of numbering plan areas (NPA), which have evolved over time into a system of three-digit area codes and seven-digit telephone numbers. Through this plan, telephone calls can be directed to particular regions of the larger NANP public switched telephone network (PSTN), where they are further routed by the local networks.|
|Calls to Mexico (until 1991)|
|Expansion of area codes|
|6.1Splits and overlays|
|6.3Decrease in expansion rate|
|Alphabetic mnemonic system|
|Cellular services and the NANP numbering scheme|
|New area codes outside the U.S. and Canada|
|Fictional telephone numbers|
|Future expansion of NANP|
|Special numbers and codes|
|List of NANPA countries and territories|
| Current system
||Developed in 1947, and first implemented in 1951 by AT&T, the NANP set out to simplify and facilitate direct dialing of long distance calls. Area code 201 was the first implemented under the plan.[1 - The NANP initially applied only to the U.S. and Canada, but at the request of the British
Colonial Office, it was expanded to Bermuda and the British West Indies (including Trinidad and Tobago), because of their historic telecommunications administration through Canada as parts of the British Empire - and also their continued associations with Canada, especially during the years of the telegraph and the All Red Line system.
||Despite the "North American" name of the calling plan, not all North American countries participate in NANP. Mexico, the Central American countries and some Caribbean countries (Cuba,
Haiti, and the French and Dutch-speaking Caribbean) are not part of the system. The only Spanish-speaking country in this plan is the Dominican Republic (although Spanish-speaking U.S. commonwealth Puerto Rico is as well). Mexican participation was planned, but implementation stopped after two area codes were put into use (Mexico City and northwestern Mexico); these ended in 1991 when Mexico withdrew from the NANP.
||The NANP is administered by the North American Numbering Plan Administration (NANPA).
||Current NANP number format can be summed up via the following:
- xxxx -
||Component - Name - Number ranges - Notes
- ITU country calling code - Most often written without the leading ""; generally indicates access to long-distance service within NANP.
||NPA - Numbering Plan Area Code - Allowed range of [2-9] for the first digit, [0-8] for the second, and [0-9] for the third digit. - Covers Canada, the United States, parts of the Caribbean Sea, and some Atlantic and Pacific islands. The area code is often enclosed in parentheses.
||NXX - Central Office (exchange) code - Allowed ranges [2-9] for the first digit, and [0-9] for both the second and third digits. - Often considered part of a subscriber number. The three digit Central Office codes are assigned to a specific CO serving its customers, but may be physically dispersed by redirection, or forwarding to mobile operators and other services.
||xxxx - Subscriber Number - [0-9] for of the four digits. - This unique four digit number is the subscriber number or station code.. - For example:
||(234) 235 5678 is valid
||(123) 234 5678 is invalid, because NPA cannot begin with a "1"
||The country calling code for the NANP is +1. In international format, an NANP number should be listed thus: +1 301 555 0100 (example using the Maryland area code). "1" is also the code often used to make direct-dialed long-distance calls within the NANP.
||Each three-digit area code may contain up to 7,919,900 unique phone numbers:
||NXX may begin only with the digits [2-9], providing a base of 8 million numbers: ( 8 x 100 x 10000 ) .
||However, the last two digits of NXX cannot both be 1, to avoid confusion with the N11 codes (subtract 80,000).
||Despite the widespread usage of NXX "555" for fictional telephone numbers — see 555 (telephone number) — today, the only such numbers specifically reserved for fictional use are "555-0100" through "555-0199", with the remaining "555" numbers released for actual assignment (subtract 100).
|| Dialing plans
||Dialing plans vary from place to place depending on whether an area has overlays (multiple area codes serving the same area) and whether the jurisdiction requires toll alerting (a leading 1 for toll calls). The NANPA's web site includes dialing plan information in its information on individual area codes.
||The standard dialing plan in most cases are as follows:
||- Local within area code - Local outside area code - Toll within area code - Toll outside area code
||Single code area, with toll alerting - 7D - 7D or 10D - 1+10D - 1+10D
||Single code area, without toll alerting - 7D - 1+10D - 7D or 1+10D - 1+10D
||Overlaid area, with toll alerting - 10D - 10D - 1+10D - 1+10D
||Overlaid area, without toll alerting - 10D or 1+10D - 1+10D - 10D or 1+10D - 1+10D. - Most areas allow permissive dialing of 10D or 1+10D even for calls that could be dialed as 7D. The number of digits dialed is unrelated to whether a call is local or toll when there is no toll alerting. Allowing 7D local dialing across an area code boundary (which is uncommon today and only possible with toll alerting) requires NXX protection on the other side to avoid dialing conflicts.
||Most areas permit local calls to be dialed as 1+10D except for Texas, Georgia, and some jurisdictions in Canada which require that callers know which numbers are local and which are toll, dialing 10D for all local calls and 1+10D for all toll calls.
||In almost all cases, operator-assisted calls require dialing 0+10D.
||Despite the similar dialing format, calls between different countries and territories that use the NANP are not necessarily charged as domestic. Calls between the US and Canada are treated as international, although typically charged at lower rates than calls to other countries. Calls to other destinations in the NANP area can be high; for example, it generally costs more to call Bermuda from the US than it does to call the UK or Japan, even though the dialing format is the same as the domestic format. Similarly, calls from Bermuda to US numbers, (including toll-free 1- 800), incur high international rates. This was because many of the island nations at the time implemented a plan of subsidizing the cost of local phone services by directly charging heavier pricing levies on the international Long Distance services.
||Because of these higher fees, a handful of scams had taken advantage of customers' unfamiliarity with pricing structure to call the legacy regional 809 area code. Some scams lured customers from the U.S. and Canada into placing expensive calls to the Caribbean, by representing the area code 809 as a regular domestic, low-cost, or toll-free call. These scams are currently on the decline, with many of the Cable and Wireless service monopolies being opened up to competition, hence bringing rates down. Additionally, many Caribbean territories have implemented local government agencies to regulate telecommunications rates of providers.[2 -
||In order to facilitate direct dialing calls, the NANP was created and instituted in 1947 by AT&T, also known as the Bell System, the U.S. telephone semi- monopoly. At first, the codes were used only by long-distance operators; the first customer-dialed calls using area codes did not occur until November 10, 1951, when the first directly-dialed call was made from Englewood, New Jersey to Alameda, California.[4 - Direct dialing was gradually instituted throughout the country, and by the mid-1960s, it was commonplace in most larger cities.
||Originally there were only 86 codes, with the biggest population areas getting the numbers that took the shortest time to dial on rotary telephones.[5 - That is why New York City was given 212, Los Angeles 213, Chicago 312, Philadelphia 215 and St. Louis received 314, while four areas received the n-maximum number of 21 clicks: South Dakota (605), North Carolina (704), South Carolina (803), and Nova Scotia/Prince Edward Island in the Canadian Maritimes (902). Additionally, in the original plan a middle digit of - 0 - indicated the area code covered an entire state/province, while area codes with a middle digit of - 1 - were assigned to jurisdictions that were divided into multiple area codes. ]
||At first, area codes were all in the form N-Y-X, where N is any number 2-9, Y is 0 or 1, and X is any number 1-9 (if Y is 0) or any number 2-9 (if Y is 1). The restriction on N saves 0 for calling the operator, and 1 for signaling a long-distance call. The restriction on the second digit, limiting it to 0 or 1, was designed to help telephone equipment recognize the difference between a three-digit "area code" (with 0 or 1 as the second digit) and the three-digit "exchange" prefix (which had avoided 0 or 1 for the second digit, because of restrictions in existing switching equipment). For example, when a caller dialed "202-555-1212", the switching equipment would recognize that "202" was an area code because of the middle 0, and route the call appropriately. If a caller were to dial 345-6789, the 4 would be recognized as a long-distance call within the area code and routed as such, without waiting to see or guessing at how many digits the caller meant to enter.
||In the late 1980s and early 1990s, NANPA (then still part of Bellcore, which is now Telcordia Technologies) began to urge and later require all long-distance calls within each area to be prefixed with the digit 1 to distinguish them from local calls, so that badly-needed prefixes with 0 or 1 in the middle could be assigned to local telephone exchanges. Also, since it had nearly run out of area codes using the above formula, it allowed the assignment of area codes using the form N-1-0, such as 210 in the San Antonio, Texas, area and 410 in eastern Maryland. Therefore, someone calling from San Jose to Los Angeles before the change would have dialed 213-555-1234 and after the change 1-213-555-1234, which then allowed 213 to be used as an exchange prefix in the San Jose area.
|| Calls to Mexico (until 1991)
||Until 1991, calls to some areas of Mexico from the United States and Canada were made using the North American Numbering Plan area codes. For example, to call a number in northwest Mexico and Mexico City before 1991:
||1 905 - Nxx xxxx (Mexico City
||1 706 - Nxx xxxx (northwest Mexico) (prior to 1980, the code was 903, rather than 706
||From 1991, Mexican participation in the NANP was discontinued in favor of the general international format, and then the Area Code 905 was assigned to Greater Toronto Area in Canada outside of Toronto (which retained Area Code 416), and Area Code 706 was reassigned to northern Georgia, surrounding the Atlanta region which retained 404:
||+52 5 - xxx xx xx (Mexico City; now - +52 55 - xx xx xx xx (eight-digit local number, land line)
||+52 5 - xxx xx xx (Mexico City; now - +52 1 55 - xx xx xx xx (eight-digit local number, cellular phone)
||+52 6 - xxx xx xx (northwestern Mexico; now - +52 6xx - xxx xx xx, land line
||+52 6 - xxx xx xx (northwestern Mexico; now - +52 1 6xx - xxx xx xx, cellular phones
|| Expansion of area codes
||Canada and the United States have experienced rapid growth in the number of area codes, particularly in the 1990s and early 2000s. There are two main reasons for this. First, there is the increasing demand for telephone services (particularly resulting from widescale adoption of fax,
modem, and mobile phone communications).
||The second and more important reason is the telecom deregulation of local telephone service in the US beginning in the early to mid-1990s. At that time, the Federal Communications Commission began allowing telecommunication companies to compete with the incumbent local exchange carrier (usually by forcing the existing monopoly service provider to lease infrastructure to other local providers who then resold the service to consumers). However, because of the original design of the numbering plan and telephone switching network that assumed only a single provider, number allocations had to be made in 10,000-number blocks.
||Thus, anytime a new local service provider entered a certain market it would be allocated 10,000 numbers by default, even if the provider only obtained a few (if any) customers. As more companies began requesting numbering allocations, this caused many area codes to begin exhausting their supply of available numbers (code "in jeopardy" in telecom jargon), and additional area codes were needed. In reality, many of the new telecom ventures were not successful; while the number of area codes started increasing rapidly, this did not necessarily translate to a much larger number of actual telephone subscribers as large blocks of numbers lay unassigned to any "real" subscribers because of the 10,000-number block allocation requirement. When these telecom ventures are merged or bought or liquidate, their blocks go to the successor, or go unused. No regulatory mechanism exists to reclaim and reassign these underutilized blocks.
||In general, area codes were added either as "splits" (in which an area code was divided into two or more regions, one retaining the older area code and the other area(s) receiving a new code), or "overlays", in which multiple area codes are assigned to the same geographical area. Subtle variations of these techniques have been used as well, such as "dedicated overlays" [in which the new overlaid area code was reserved for a particular type of service, such as cellular phones and pagers (the only true example of this was area code 917 in New York City)] and "concentrated overlays", in which some of the area retained a single area code, while the rest of the region received an overlay code.
||After the remaining valid area codes were used up by expansion, in 1995 the rapid increase in the need for more area codes (both splits and overlays) forced NANPA to allow the digits 2 through 8 to be used as a middle digit in new area code assignments, with 9 being reserved as a "last resort" for potential future expansion. At the same time, local exchanges were allowed to use 1 or 0 as a middle digit. The first area codes without a 1 or 0 as the middle digit were area code 334 in Alabama and area code 360 in Washington, which both began service on January 15, 1995. Area codes, or "numbering plan areas" ending in double digits, such as toll-free 800, 888, 877, and 866, personal 700 numbers, and high-toll 900 numbers, are reserved as easily-recognizable codes (ERCs) and are not issued to actual geographic areas. (Nevada was denied - 777 - for this reason; it received - 775 - instead when most of Nevada split from 702, which continues to serve the Las Vegas area.
|| Splits and overlays
||By 1995, many cities in the United States and Canada had more than one area code, either through splitting the city into different areas (splits) or having more than one area code for the same geographical area (overlays). For example, in Manhattan, subscribers' numbers had the NPA code 212, but two additional codes—first 917 (which initially was exclusively for cellular phones and pagers until that idea was struck down in a Federal court), then 646—were also introduced. This means that the area code must be dialed, even for local calls. In other areas, 10-digit or 11-digit dialing is now required for all local calls. The transition to 10-digit dialing typically starts with a permissive dialing phase in which both 7-digit and 10-digit dialing is optional. During this period, the transition is heavily publicized. After a period of several months, the mandatory dialing phase is introduced, in which 7-digit dialing no longer works. Atlanta was the first US city to have mandatory 10-digit dialing throughout its metropolitan area, roughly coinciding with the 1996 Summer Olympics held there. Atlanta was used as the test case not only because of its size, but also because it enjoyed the world's largest fiber optic network at the time (five times that of New York then), and it was home to BellSouth (now part of AT&T), then the Southeastern Regional Bell Operating Company. ]
||7-digit dialing: - Nxx xxxx - (NPA code not required
||10-digit dialing: - NPA Nxx xxxx -
||11-digit dialing: - 1 NPA Nxx xxxx -
||The overlap between area codes and exchange prefixes has occasionally produced some confusion because the three digits can be the same for both. Nashua, New Hampshire, for example, has a local exchange that begins with (603) 888, which is also an area code for toll-free calls. If somebody in Nashua means to call 1-888-555-1212 but forgets the initial "1," he or she will actually dial the local number 1-603-888-5551. This, however, is generally not a problem in major metropolitan areas with overlapping area codes, which were mandated by the FCC to dial all ten digits for all local calls so as not to give new numbers or telecommunications providers a "disadvantage."
|| Expansion issues
||Depending on the techniques used for area code expansion, the effect on telephone users varies. In areas in which overlays were used, this generally avoids the need for converting telephone numbers, so existing directories, business records, letterheads, business cards, advertising, and "speed-dialing" settings can retain the same phone numbers, while the overlay is used for new number allocations. The primary impact on telephone users is the necessity of remembering and dialing 10- or 11-digit numbers when only 7-digit dialing was previously permissible.
||The use of a splitting instead of an overlay generally avoids the requirement for mandatory area-code dialing, but at the expense of having to convert some of the numbers to the new Area Code. In addition to the requirements of updating records and directories to accommodate the new numbers, for efficient conversion this requires a period of "permissive dialing" in which both the new and old Area Codes of the splitting are allowed to work. Also, in many splittings there were significant technical issues involved, especially when the Area Code splittings occurred over boundaries other than phone network divisions.
||As an extreme example of an area code splitting gone somewhat awry, in 1998 the Minneapolis – Saint Paul Twin Cities, which until that point used just the 612 area code, split into the 612 and 651 Area Codes, with St. Paul and the eastern metropolitan area receiving the new 651 Area Code. However, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission mandated that the boundary of this splitting exactly follow municipal boundaries (which were distinctly different from telephone exchange boundaries), and that all subscribers keep their 7-digit numbers. These two goals were directly at odds with the reason for the area code splitting (to generate additional phone numbers), and there were more than 40 exchanges whose prefix territory straddled town boundaries along the Area Code splitting. The result was prefixes duplicated in both Area Codes, which counteracted much of the benefit of the splitting, with only 200 of 700 prefixes in the 612 Area moving entirely to the 651 Area. As a result, in less than two years the 612 Area Code again exhausted its supply of phone numbers, and it underwent another three-way split in the year 2000 - creating the new 763 and 952 Area Codes. Again, the split followed political boundaries rather than rate center boundaries, resulting in additional split prefixes, and in a few cases resulted in numbers initially moved to the 651 Area Code being moved again to the 763 Area Code in less than two years.
|| Decrease in expansion rate
||Recognizing that the major cause in the proliferation of area codes was due to the telecom deregulation act and the 10,000 number block assignment, the FCC instructed NANPA (by then administered by NeuStar) to look for a solution to alleviate the numbering shortage. As a result a new program called "number pooling" was piloted in 2001 which allowed allocating numbers in 1,000-number blocks rather than 10,000 numbers. Because of the design of the switched telephone network, this was a considerable technical challenge and was carried out together with another technically-challenging program, local number portability. Since then the program has been rolled out to most parts of the United States and together with aggressive reclamation of unused number blocks from telecom providers, the need for additional area codes has been reduced, so much so that the implementation of large numbers of previously designated area splits and overlays has been postponed indefinitely.
|| Alphabetic mnemonic system
||Another oddity of NANP telephone numbering is the use of alphabetic dialing. On most US and Canadian telephones, three letters appear on each number button from 2 through 9 (as standardized much later by ISO 9995-8 and, in Europe, E.161). This accommodates 24 letters. Historically, the letters Q and Z were omitted, though on some modern telephones, they are added, so that the alphabet is apportioned as follows:
2 = ABC 3 = DEF 4 = GHI 5 = JKL 6 = MNO 7 = PRS or PQRS 8 = TUV 9 = WXY or WYZ or WXYZ. - No letters are allocated to the 1 or 0 keys (although some corporate voicemail systems are set up to count Q and Z as 1, and some old telephones assigned the Z to the digit 0).
|Originally, this scheme was meant as a mnemonic device for telephone number prefixes. When telephone numbers in the US were standardized in the mid-20th century, they were made seven digits long, including a two-digit prefix, the latter expressed as letters rather than numbers. (Before World War II, a few localities used three letters and four numbers; in most cities with customer dialing, phone numbers had only six digits — two letters followed by four numbers.) The prefix was a name, and the first two or three letters (usually shown in capitals) of the name were dialed. Later, the third letter (where previously used) was replaced by a number, or an extra number was added; this generally happened after World War II, although New York City did this in 1930. Thus, the famous Glenn Miller tune "PEnnsylvania 6-5000" refers to a telephone number 736-5000, the number of the Hotel Pennsylvania, which still bears the same number today. Similarly, the classic Elizabeth Taylor film "BUtterfield 8" refers to the section of New York City where the film is set, where the telephone prefixes include 288 (on the East Side of Manhattan between roughly 64th and 86th Streets). This is why, in some works of fiction, phone numbers will begin with "KLondike 5" or "KLamath 5", which translates to 555, a mostly unused and reserved exchange. This practice continues in film and television to this day, even though the prefix system has long been unused. ]
||Today this system has been abandoned (it was phased out starting in the early 1960s, though it persisted in some places as late as the mid-1970s, and was included in Bell of Pennsylvania directories until 1983, and there is a construction company in Philadelphia that still has alphabetic exchanges on some of their dump trucks as of 2010), but alphabetic dialing remains as a commercial mnemonic gimmick, particularly when combined with toll-free numbers. For example, one can dial 1-800-FLOWERS to send flowers to someone, or 1-800 DENTIST to find a local dentist. Sometimes, longer phonewords are used - for example one might be invited to give money to a public radio station by dialing 1-866-KPBS-GIVE. The "number" is 8 digits long, but only the first seven need be dialed. If an eighth (or more) digit is dialed, the switching system will ignore it. Mobile users may need to manually drop any numbers past the seventh digit as some mobile switching systems will not automatically ignore them, resulting in a failed call. In addition to commercial uses, alphabetic dialing has influenced, in rare cases, the choice of regional area codes in the United States. For example, when East Tennessee was split into two area codes in 1999, the region surrounding Knoxville received a new code; the code 865 was chosen to represent the word "VOL"—short for "Volunteers", the nickname of athletic teams at the University of Tennessee. Likewise, when the 606 area code of central and eastern Kentucky was split, Lexington, the region's largest city, adopted the new code 859 (which spells UKY) in honor of the University of Kentucky. The Miami area originally had the 305 area code, but then 786 was added because of the increasing demand for telephone numbers. 786 spells out SUN in honor of Florida being the Sunshine State. 352 is used around Gainesville, Florida, north of Tampa and northwest of Orlando and spells FLA again as a nod to the state. The area around Cape Canaveral, Florida, was split from area code 407 and became area code 321. This represented the launch of a rocket, specifically 3-2-1-Blastoff! The State of Nevada has previously attempted to obtain area code 777 (lucky 7's), but was unable to secure it.[6 - When the Dayton, Ohio area split from the Cincinnati, Ohio
Area code 513, literature promoting the new area code 937 took advantage of the fact that the numbers spelled "YES". When the three Canadian northern territories were given their own area code, they were assigned 867, which spells "TOP", reflecting the area's position at the "top" of the world.
||See Telephone numbers
|| Cellular services and the NANP numbering scheme
||A difference between the NANP system and other plans is that apart from area code 600 in Canada, no separate, non-geographical area codes have been created for cellular phones, as is the case in most European and Asian countries, where mobile services are assigned their own prefixes. This means that most North American mobile phones are assigned the same locality-specific codes as landlines, and calls to them are billed at the same rate. Consequently, the caller-pays pricing model adopted in other countries, in which calls to cellular phones are charged at a higher nationwide rate, but receiving calls is free, could not be used. Instead, North American cellular telephone users are also generally charged to receive calls as well (subscriber pays). In the past, this discouraged mobile users from using the phones or giving out the number. However, robust price competition among carriers has led to dramatic cuts in the average price per minute for contract customers (for both inbound and outbound calls), which can compare favorably to those in caller-pays countries. Most users select bundle pricing plans that include all the minutes they expect to use in a month. Many carriers also offer free calling between mobile phones on the carrier's network, and some also offer free calling to a list of user-selected phone numbers (which can include both cell phones and landlines).
||Some industry observers have blamed user pays as one of the main factors in the relatively low mobile phone penetration rate in the United States compared to that of Europe. In the wireless-subscriber-pays model the convenience of the mobility is charged to the subscriber. Callers from outside the local-calling region of the assigned number are, however, forced to pay for a long-distance call, although domestic long distance rates are generally lower than the rates caller-pays systems charge. Conversely, an advantage of caller-pays is the relative absence of telemarketing and nuisance calls to mobile numbers. The integrated numbering plan also enables local number portability between fixed and wireless services within a region, allowing users to switch to mobile service while keeping their phone number, which is not a common option in caller-pays systems.
||The initial plan for overlays did allow for providing separate area codes for use by mobile phones, faxes, pagers, etc., although these were still assigned to a specific geographical area, rather than the nationwide mobile area codes common to most other countries, and were charged at the same rate as other area codes. Initially, the new 917 area code for New York City was specifically assigned for this purpose within the 5 boroughs; however, a Federal court struck this down and banned the use of an area code for a specific telephony purpose. ] Since mobile telephony is expanding faster than landline, new area codes typically have a disproportionately large fraction of mobile numbers, although landline and other services rapidly follow and local network portability can blur these distinctions.
||The experience of Hurricane Katrina and similar events revealed a possible disadvantage of the methods employed in the geographic assignment of cellular numbers. Many mobile phone users could not be reached, their phones rendered inoperable, even when they were far from the stricken areas, because the routing of calls to their phones depended on equipment in the affected area.
||Another related issue for services like mobile telephony is the scarcity of telephone numbers. In contrast to other countries, where mobile and other special-number operators enjoy wide leeway to generate large numbers of telephone numbers, this is not an option in the NANP, with its geographical area codes with a fixed number of digits.
|| New area codes outside the U.S. and Canada
||Prior to 1995, all other NANP countries and territories outside the fifty United States and Canada, including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, shared the NPA code 809, but they are now able to have separate codes. Code (809) is now only used by the Dominican Republic. In 1997 the United States Pacific Territories of the Northern Mariana Islands and Guam became part of the NANP, as did American Samoa in October 2004. The Dutch possession of Saint Maarten was originally scheduled to join the NANP on May 31, 2010, but the changeover has been postponed to a yet-to-be determined future date.
||Bermuda - :
||Until 1995: - +1 809 29 - x xxxx
||After 1995: - +1 441 - (xxx) xxxx
||Puerto Rico - :
||Until 1996: - +1 809 xx - x xxxx
||1996-2001: - +1 787 - xxx xxxx
||After 2001: - +1 787 - xxx xxxx - or - - +1 939 - xxx xxxx (overlay for entire island
||US Virgin Islands - :
||Until 1997: - +1 809 xx - x xxxx
||After 1997: - +1 340 - xxx xxxx
||Northern Marianas - :
||Until 1997: - +670 - xxx xxxx
||After 1997: - +1 670 - xxx xxxx
||Guam - :
||Until 1997: - +671 - xxx xxxx
||After 1997: - +1 671 - xxx xxxx
||American Samoa - :
||Until October 1, 2004: - +684 - xxx xxxx
||After October 2, 2004: - +1 684 - xxx xxxx
||Saint Maarten - :
||Currently: - +599 5 - xx xxxx
||After joining NANP: - +1 721 - xxx xxxx (date to be determined
||See also:Split from the 809 Area code
|| Fictional telephone numbers